@dhoechst I just went through and turned them all off. I use Tweetbot anyway which has less of the annoying stuff.
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 13, 2013
via Twitter
It's a thing. Sometimes there's stuff.
@dhoechst I just went through and turned them all off. I use Tweetbot anyway which has less of the annoying stuff.
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 13, 2013
via Twitter
@dhoechst My favorite is the notification for when someone I follow follows someone new. Not sure why I would care…
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 13, 2013
via Twitter
I swear, @salesforce must be drunk in the week leading up to @dreamforce. #forcedotcom http://t.co/CrNu07epKq
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 13, 2013
via Twitter
@veterankamikaze Ah, never mind. Field set was a red herring. #askforce
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 13, 2013
via Twitter
Editing records in VF where the inputs come from a field set. Changes don’t seem to make it back to controller. What am I missing? #askforce
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 13, 2013
via Twitter
@shivanathd I think we’re missing something. The idea is: Catch exception. Call future method to log exception. Let exception happen again.
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 12, 2013
via Twitter
@shivanathd Can’t commit the new object if I still want to let the original exception happen. Thought the future method would get past that.
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 12, 2013
via Twitter
@shivanathd Darn. Was really hoping to be able to catch an exception, log it, then let the code fail with the same exception. #askforce
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 12, 2013
via Twitter
Totally just spammed someone on twitter. I feel terrible.
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 12, 2013
via Twitter
If a method that calls an @future has an uncaught exception (after the call to the @future), does the future still execute? #askforce
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 12, 2013
via Twitter
Five browsers across OS X and Windows and I can’t get this stupid video to play. http://t.co/wnQVGZKGeU needs some serious help.
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 11, 2013
via Twitter
It was the best of thymes, it was the wurst of thymes. #LiteraryFoodCriticism
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 6, 2013
via Twitter
@MrSteve_W Could you replace all of those Trial_Status__c OR clauses with one Trial_Status__c IN clause? #askforce
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 4, 2013
via Twitter
I just earned the 'Land of the Free (Level 2)' badge on @untappd! http://t.co/93tGAKecEG
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 3, 2013
via Twitter
Portland is going down. #SEAvPOR — Drinking an Anchor Steam Beer by @AnchorBrewing @ CenturyLink Field — http://t.co/pBIiEIhBn8
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 3, 2013
via Twitter
#SEAvPOR pre-match. — Drinking a Lucille IPA by @GeorgetownBeer @ Hawks Nest — http://t.co/UQMqrksHY4
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) November 3, 2013
via Twitter
@_drako I’ve got the repeated form element at the very end of the VF just for this reason.
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) October 25, 2013
via Twitter
@_drako Since there doesn’t seem to be a downside to what I’m doing, I’ll proceed. Thanks for the feedback! #askforce
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) October 25, 2013
via Twitter
@_drako I use demoting here and there. A little tricky when I need to deal with collections of sObjects. #askforce
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) October 25, 2013
via Twitter
@_drako Yeah, I normally would’t do it except for how jQuery .dialog() manages to screw up forms. #askforce.
— Mike Jones (@veterankamikaze) October 25, 2013
via Twitter